| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 Jason_Vaysberg Jason Vaysberg
#player2 Jonathan_Lindh Jonathan Lindh
>Jason_Vaysberg: AACEFTT 8D FACET +28 28
#note Jason said he could have played FACTA here. FACTA is best but FACET is near the top as well.
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?AAGHNO 7G HAG +24 24
#note I thought for sure I was missing a bingo, but nothing exists. HAO or HAG are fine.
>Jason_Vaysberg: BU F8 .UB +13 41
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?ALNOSW D8 .LOWN +22 46
#note No playable 7's. FLOWN is probably the best non-bingo play, but managed to miss all of the 8's with SNOW in them such as SNOWFLEA, SNOWFALL, and SNOWBALL. The 76 point bingos open a big scoring spot at D12 which might be a concern after Jason's last two tile play, but you have to take the points. Fatigue was a huge factor in this miss.
>Jason_Vaysberg: ADEEIST J1 IDEATES +72 113
#note Best. Jason would have had to leave the SNOWFLEA spot open and we would have had a volatile game, which I like.
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?AHINOS 11F SHINOlA +76 122
#note 2nd best, but whiffed on 5D mANIHOTS for 90. Oddly enough, Quackle only has SHINOLA as 5 points behind MANIHOTS despite SHINOLA scoring 14 fewer points. I do not get this at all.
>Jason_Vaysberg: AAEPRST 2G REA.APTS +72 185
#note Ooh! H1 ASPARTATE for 86!
>Jonathan_Lindh: ABFIILT 1H FA.L +40 162
#note H1 BEFIT for 33 or 1E FLAB for 41. FAIL is pretty close in win % and equity, though.
>Jason_Vaysberg: EEGLRTU L6 REGUL.TE +72 257
#note Best.
>Jonathan_Lindh: ABIIINT M12 INTI +14 176
#note Probably too aggro, but I shed my excess I's and fork the board.
>Jason_Vaysberg: KOW 8L .OWK +36 293
#note Jason did not have a good play on row 15 so he opted to do GOWK.
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?ABDIII 15L B.DI +30 206
#note Still have an I's problem.
>Jason_Vaysberg: EOPT F2 POET +32 325
#note At the time, I thought PREADOPTS was good and PREADAPTS was not good, but they are both good. Very nice play. Scores and plays defensive, which is why I quickly challenged. I thought this play put me too far out of range.
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?AAIIJO - +0 206
#note Unsuccessful challenge.
>Jason_Vaysberg: EUV E5 UVE. +18 343
#note I was so tired this game, I wrote UVEA as a part of my score instead of Jason's which resulted in us having to correct the score at the end of the game. I also was getting very low on time here.
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?AAIIJO C12 AJI +22 228
#note This is probably the only play with any realistic chance of winning.
>Jason_Vaysberg: DEIOXZ 14A OX.DIZE +88 431
#note Those chances went down the toilet with this great find.
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?AIOSYY 10I AY +28 256
#note I was so brain dead, I played AY instead OY, forgetting to save the A for plays under ZA.
>Jason_Vaysberg: CMMNO A10 COMM.N +45 476
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?DEIOSY H14 DO +35 291
#note Deferring the bingo is a decision Quackle agrees with. Nothing wins. DO is actually best.
>Jason_Vaysberg: NU A8 UN...... +42 518
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?EINOSY 1N OY +17 308
#note OY looks fine. Don't want to give Jason full rack knowledge.
>Jason_Vaysberg: Q O14 Q. +11 529
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?EINRRS B2 RINsERS +68 376
#note I should bingo through the A instead of the B column to save some spread. Jason has no potential bingos on the B column but does have some 28 point plays through the A.
>Jason_Vaysberg: EEILRRV 4H VE.LIER +28 557
#note 2nd best to 3I LEVEE for 36.
>Jonathan_Lindh: G I9 G.. +6 382
#note 2nd best to 10H GAY for 10. I had about 3 seconds left on my clock after I played GAN.
>Jonathan_Lindh: (R) +2 384
#note Final score recorded as 557-381.
|
